Ah, you have spent some time reading through the Internet, haven’t you? Looking a decent entry-level SSD, aren’t we? If you need a reliable SSD that does not deplete the bank, Crucial BX200 and Kingston V300 are certainly viable. Both models are designed to fulfil more casual needs, available at reasonably affordable prices. Both brands are also big names on the niche. Crucial is a famous brand nowadays because of their high-quality products, while Kingston has been known since a long time ago as a global manufacturer of data storage devices. Which one is better for our money?
Unlike Crucial BX200, which prefers to focus on capacity choices that are the most popular, Kingston V300 is available in smaller sizes. You can acquire Kingston V300 in 60 GB or 120 GB, besides the usual 240 GB, 480 GB, and 960 GB (the three of them are available from Crucial BX200). However, it is much more recommended that you choose an SSD with a larger capacity, because smaller ones tend to run out of space a lot sooner, especially if you want to install a lot of heavy programs. A game nowadays, with the latest technologies, can reach 20 GB in size (Dark Souls 3, for example). Which means, with a 60 GB SSD, you can only install 3 games. So, unless you really need an SSD as soon as possible but are unable to afford the larger variants, purchasing a low-capacity SSD is not recommended. Have a look: Crucial BX200 Vs M500.
Testing both models in real-life usage, Crucial BX200 manages to outperform Kingston V300 quite significantly. Benchmark results show that Crucial BX200 is faster by about 15% than Kingston V300. In fact, Crucial BX200 has better performance compared to most other SSD products, while Kingston V300 has only average performance. Both models operate with SATA III and backward compatible with SATA II.
Kingston V300 does not come with any software. Crucial BX200 includes Acronis True Image HD for data migration and Crucial Storage Executive for drive monitoring and maintenance. These two additions are very handy and useful for installing the device itself, as you will be able to transfer your data from your old storage into Crucial BX200 easily, and also to keep it healthy and fit for a long term.
Crucial BX200 Vs Kingston V300
|Crucial BX200||Kingston V300|
|Key Features||- Sequential reads/writes up to 540 / 490 MB/s on all file types and random reads/writes up to 66k / 78k IOPS - More than 13x faster than a typical hard drive and 40x more energy efficient - More durable than a hard drive - no small moving parts that are prone to failure and available in 2.5-inch form factor in capacities up to 960GB - Includes an activation key for Acronis True Image HD software for easy data migration||- Faster - improves speed of loading applications and system boot up - Reliable - with no moving parts, solid-state drives are less likely to fail than standard hard drives - Economical - design optimized to make migrating to an SSD more affordable - Multiple capacities - to fit your workload, Interface : SATA Rev. 3.0 (6Gb/s) - with backwards compatibility to SATA Rev. 2.0 Form Factor - 2.5-inch drive available in 7.0mm with plastic adapter to fit in 9.5mm system - Guaranteed - three-year warranty, free technical support - Silent - runs silent and cool|
|Customer Rating||4.7 out of 5.0 stars||4.5 out of 5.0 stars|
|Best Offer||Save Money Please click here||Save Money Please click here|
NOTE : Product prices, availability, ratings and save money information are accurate as of the date/time indicated on post time (as seen right bellow the tittle) and are subject to change. Any price, ratings, availability and save money information displayed on Amazon Site at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
In general, you should choose Crucial BX200 instead of Kingston V300. It is better in every aspect. Only if you do need a 60GB or 120GB SSD that Kingston V300 is a considerable option.