Adata SU800 Vs Samsung 850 Evo

Adata, Samsung

As one of the world’s largest electronics manufacturers, Samsung does have some Development Division, including one is the SSD. One of the collections is the Samsung 850 Evo. The data could be said to be one of the manufacturers that are quite diligent in creating a NAND-based storage media and at once have belonged to quite good especially the Adata SU800. What if we created a comparison SU800 Adata vs Samsung 850 Evo?

Adata SU800 vs Samsung 850 Evo

Adata SU800
Adata Ultimate SU800 itself be SSD form factor with 2.5″ and of course the use of SSD utilizing line SATA interface III. But through this SSD, Adata tried different SSD offers from the ranks of the SSD’s collection at their disposal nowadays. The difference with this Adata SSD collection lies in the use of other 3D flash NAND type TLC. A blend of these two components is claimed if Adata Ultimate capacity 256 GB this SU800 is able to offer sequential Read and Write speeds reaching 560 MB/s and 520 MB/s. Perfomance Capabilities to offer SSD is also seems to be set from the some of the features that are used, one of them a smart algorithm “Intelligent caching SLC”. These features are able to make NAND flash memory used can work like fashion SLC (Single-Level cell) and also supported DRAM cache buffer. In addition, the use of 3D NAND flash SSDS also believed if SSD is able to offer higher density, efficiency and resilience that is much better than the SSD which uses 2D NAND flash. SSD designed for the PC user, either a Desktop PC or laptop has powered some of the features of the flagship as one can minimize the LDPC ECC data error so age wear of SSD Adata Ultimate SU800 is becoming longer.

Samsung 850 Evo
Since the latest article about Samsung 960 Evo vs 850 Evo, we are going to make another one for any reference-needed. Maybe Samsung 850 Evo SSD very minimal accessories in one packaging, because it found only SSD, guide book and CD Software Samsung Magician. But, the Samsung 850 Evo designed using some of the features of Samsung’s own development results in between 3D Vertical NAND (V-NAND) type TLC, which combined with the Samsung controllers MGX. The capacity could reach 2 TB SSD is packaged only in form factor storage 2.5 with 6.8 mm thickness, so can be used in different laptops available today. Based on the specifications of the Samsung SSD, 850 EVO 2 TB offers read speed reached 540 MB/s and write speed reached 520 MB/s. While the data transfer file copy from HDD to SSD was able to produce a speed of 120 MB free/s. When try copy Paste a large file on the internal SSD feels once experienced a decrease in speeds up to 9.7 MB/s. Samsung 850 EVO mSATA is a machine speed. With the software “Samsung Magician”, you could enable RAPID mode to take memory PC (DRAM) reply not in use and use it as a cache memory and increase the capacity of DRAMS until the total reaches 25%.

Adata SU800 Vs Samsung 850 Evo

Adata SU800Samsung 850 Evo
BrandADATASamsung
Key Features- High speed, new generation 3D NAND technology - Bigger capacity, better performance, improved reliability - High performance, up to 560MB/s read and 520MB/s write- Incredible Sequential Read/Write Performance : Up to 540MB/s and 520MB/s Respectively,and Random Read/Write IOPS Performance : Up to 98K and 90K Respectively
Price

check here

Customer Rating4.5 out of 5.0 stars4.8 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

NOTE : Product prices, availability, ratings and save money information are accurate as of the date/time indicated on post time (as seen right bellow the tittle) and are subject to change. Any price, ratings, availability and save money information displayed on Amazon Site at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

Conclusion
If compared to its price itself, slightly, Samsung 850 Evo wins among the option here about Adata SU8000 vs Samsung 850 EVO. However, the lower-cost SSD 850 EVO among or approximately $189.99 at Amazon drive uses TLC, but it is actually not the 3D kind, but rather the older which is less durable planar variety too.

Share Button

Leave a Reply